avoid-leaking-state-in-ember-objects: Easily add an ignored property?
See original GitHub issueI’d like to add an additional ignored property to the avoid-leaking-state-in-ember-objects rule. It takes a list of ignored properties from the supplied options, but it’s all-or-nothing: there’s no easy way to add them. Can we modify this rule to merge in additional properties, or can we at least export the DEFAULT_IGNORED_PROPERTIES
const from the module so I can append to it in .eslint.js?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Reactions:2
- Comments:9 (5 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Ignore properties in data model while keeping them in EF ...
The problem with this solution is that next time I run add-migration , it will create a migration that will remove the column...
Read more >More explanation about [Ignore] attribute | Optimizely Developer
Well, that's easy to test. I'm adding two new properties to an existing pagetype. [Ignore] public virtual string TempProperty1 { get; set; }...
Read more >How to ignore properties with System.Text.Json | Microsoft Learn
Ignore individual properties. To ignore individual properties, use the [JsonIgnore] attribute. The following example shows a type to serialize.
Read more >Jackson Ignore Properties on Marshalling - Baeldung
This tutorial will show how to ignore certain fields when serializing an object to JSON using Jackson 2.x.
Read more >Ignored Properties · Issue #290 · groue/GRDB.swift - GitHub
I want to have in my class some properties that I will use in my application and I don't want to add columns...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
@travis-jm My bad. I was doing a bit of cleaning the other day and I must have deleted my branch that had this PR by mistake. I’ve since restored it and have re-opened the PR!
The list is additive for avoid-leaking-state-in-components. Any reason this one shouldn’t be the same?