validate generated resources
See original GitHub issueit would be nice to generate nice validation error messages if the generated resources are not invalid in any way - linking to the individual generated files in target/classes/META-INF/fabric8/
so that folks can easily see whats wrong. e.g. missing name / image or bad names for services or whatever
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 7 years ago
- Comments:14 (14 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Validate the Resource Files - IBM
Before you generate the target resource files, it is important to validate the customized files in the synchronization directory. The validation process: checks ......
Read more >Custom validation and defaulting for code generated resources
I think we're going to quickly run into situations where we want custom (handcrafted) validations or defaults for a particular resource and we're...
Read more >Resource-operation-validate - FHIR v5.0.0-cibuild
The validate operation checks whether the attached content would be acceptable either generally, as a create, an update or as a delete to...
Read more >java - How to handle Resource validation in REST webservices?
I'm building a REST webservice in Java using Spring, Jersey and Hibernate (JPA). Now I'm trying to add support for validation in my...
Read more >What is Data Validation? How It Works and Why It's Important
When validating data, the standards and structure of the data model that the dataset is stored in should be well understood. Failing to...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
LGTM!
imo that looks good (and is of course much, much better than having no validation 😉