Randomly Initialized ESM's
See original GitHub issueHello friends,
Requesting a very minimal feature addition. Could we get an esm.pretrained.esm_random
(or similarly named), maybe with 4 or 5 seeds for completeness? It’s not hard to randomly initialize one’s own ESM models, but it would be a nice quality of life improvement. It would also ensure some consistency in these “random ESM” baselines 😃
Thanks! Nick
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 2 years ago
- Comments:5 (2 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
On generalization capability of randomly initialized vs pre ...
TLDR; Q: “Can training neural networks from randomly initialized weights lead to better generalization than from pre-trained weights?” A: They can.
Read more >Issues · facebookresearch/esm - GitHub
Evolutionary Scale Modeling (esm): Pretrained language models for proteins - Issues · facebookresearch/esm.
Read more >Conservation laws in a neural network architecture - GMD
The 5000 independent days include randomly initialized values for active species concentrations at the beginning of each day of simulation. Cosine of zenith ......
Read more >Random initialization - Machine Learning Glossary
Random initialization refers to the practice of using random numbers to initialize the weights of a machine learning model.
Read more >Synopsys True Random Number Generators
TRNGs are used to generate keys, initialization vectors and nonces used in many security standards. The Internet of Things (IoT) is a fast-growing...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
@ulupo feel free to take this issue! Thanks for helping out.
@tomsercu thanks a lot for the clarification!