Stuck on an issue?
Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
requiring profile for profiles
See original GitHub issuebasically from @roll
The Tabular Data Resource spec, for example, does not indicate that profile is required. This was an important change in rc1
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Comments:14 (14 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Create mandatory user profiles - Windows - Microsoft Learn
A mandatory user profile is a special type of pre-configured roaming user profile that administrators can use to specify settings for users.
Read more >Types of User Profiles: Mandatory Profile [Breakdown] - Ivanti
Mandatory profiles are useful in circumstances where employees are not permitted to make changes to their computer and customize their settings.
Read more >Profiles - Salesforce Help
Profiles define how users access objects and data, and what they can do within the application. When you create users, you assign a...
Read more >Profile Guidance - W3C on GitHub
A profile is a named set of constraints on one or more identified base specifications, necessary to accomplish a particular function.
Read more >Intro to Profile Manager - Apple Support
You use Profile Manager to configure and distribute settings to Apple devices in your organization, school, or business.
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
so @rufuspollock and @roll should we not just revert back to the wording of v1-rc1?
Assign this to @rufuspollock as it is blocked on #468 which is assigned.