jest/valid-describe false positive for descibe.each variant
See original GitHub issueThe rule jest/valid-describe
errors for the describe.each
variant:
describe.each([...data])('Something', data => {
// ...
})
leads to:
3:15 error First argument must be name jest/valid-describe
3:15 error Describe requires name and callback arguments jest/valid-describe
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Reactions:2
- Comments:15 (7 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Generalizable characteristics of false-positive bacterial variant ...
Minimizing false positives is a critical issue when variant calling as no method is without error. It is common practice to post-process a...
Read more >VarBin, a novel method for classifying true and false positive ...
Sequencing or alignment errors create "false positive" variants, which are often retained in the variant screening process.
Read more >Genetic Variants of SARS-CoV-2 May Lead to False Negative ...
Laboratories should expect some false negative results because the SARS-CoV-2 virus can mutate over time and not be detected.
Read more >variant-pcr-test-5-procedure-ssi.pdf - Statens Serum Institut
This analysis indicates a very high sensitivity (above 99.9%) and specificity of this assay, including a false positive rate of around 1 per...
Read more >Detection of False-Positive Deletions from the Database of ...
Next generation sequencing is an emerging technology that has been widely used in the detection of genomic variants. However, since its depth of...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
One step ahead of you 😉
I’m going to make a quick fix to ignore
each
, and open a new issue to supporteach
.The rule readme actually excludes
each
:Thanks again for the quick fixes ❤️