Stuck on an issue?
Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
valid-describe should support describe.each
See original GitHub issueAs per #334, valid-describe currently doesn’t support describe.each, instead just bailing out.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Reactions:4
- Comments:6 (3 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
ESLint: Definition for rule 'jest/valid-describe' was not found ...
The rule was renamed to valid-describe-callback in eslint-plugin-jest@25.0.0 , which you updated past. You will need to rename any config ...
Read more >eslint-plugin-jest - npm
You can also tell ESLint about the environment variables provided by Jest ... valid-describe-callback, Enforce valid describe() callback, ✓.
Read more >Solved 3. Which of the following segments is VALID? Describe
Question: 3. Which of the following segments is VALID? Describe each error in the INVALID statement(s). a) int *rPtr; cin >> rptr; b)...
Read more >exam_1_sample_with_solutions - CPS 603 Sample Exam 1...
CPS 603 Sample Exam 1 (Chapters 1 7) The exam will consist of 10 ... In terms of system quality , the code...
Read more >rules - valid-describe.md
This rule validates that the second parameter of a describe() function is a callback function. This callback function: should not be async ...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
I think conceptually it doesn’t make sense to separate them, even though the implementation might be a bit big. But branching inside of it into what’s essentially to separate rules can work? Without increasing implementation complexity
Well then make an issue 😜
I thought I fixed all the false positives?