Rename packages to match JUnit Pioneer
See original GitHub issueCurrent package prefix is org.codefx.junit.io
. The new prefix is not decided upon yet but the domain junit-pioneer.org
belongs to the project and might be used.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 7 years ago
- Comments:33 (26 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Sam Brannen on Twitter: "@nipafx yep, yep, same Sam(e). But ...
This you?. github.com. Rename packages to match JUnit Pioneer · Issue #24 · junit-pioneer/junit-pioneer. Current package prefix is org.codefx.junit.io.
Read more >Cartesian Product of Parameters [removed in 2.0]
The CartesianProductTest extension has undergone significant changes in 1.6.0. This included renaming it to @CartesianTest and moving it into a new package.
Read more >SpringBoot Junit5 fails when renaming package of class ...
I'm struggling with JUnit 5 when moving the @SpringBootApplication to a different package. I have setup a new SpringBoot-project (2.2.1.
Read more >The Java Module System Beyond The Basics - nipafx.dev
Java 9 shipped the Java Platform Module System, which brings language-level modularity to the Java ecosystem. But you already know that and ...
Read more >Apache Commons IO Release Notes
listFiles does not list matching files if File parameter is a ... import packages #239. ... Bump junit-pioneer from 1.4.1 to 1.4.2 #240....
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Thanks (I guess) … you’re letting me be the bad guy? After stating that I didn’t care?
I hate underscores in package names, so I vote that Java 11 allows dashes in package names.
In the mean-time, I’m going to vote for org.junitpioneer as well (+1 +1 +1).
** EDIT **
It looks like people have put in feature requests for dashes in package names before - https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-4080461 (and duplicates). It’s marked as fixed because they changed the convention for mapping domain names to package names in the JLS (sigh).
Domains cost money and I’m not made of it. 😉