Stuck on an issue?

Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.

And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.

Wrong figure recognition

See original GitHub issue

example paper: https://journals.aps.org/prc/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevC.100.014306 (same with #781 )

Fig 1(missed)

Fig 2(wrong head and figDesc)

<figure xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:id="fig_0" coords="5,513.20,380.04,36.03,7.88;5,304.15,391.00,4.48,7.88;5,308.63,388.87,4.66,5.98;5,308.63,395.50,2.99,5.25;5,313.79,391.00,32.61,7.88;5,348.49,389.35,5.98,5.25;5,355.00,390.21,193.95,8.97;5,304.15,401.96,245.08,8.57;5,304.15,412.13,245.08,9.29;5,304.15,423.09,245.09,8.97;5,304.15,434.05,173.68,8.97">
	<head>B and the 1 + 1 0</head>
	<label>11</label>
	<figDesc>state of 10 B. The panels (a) are calculated with the THSR + pair wave function pair with optimized parameters. The panels (b) are obtained by using only the pairing term p with parameter c = 0. For all these calculations, β parameters are set to optimized values in the corresponding THSR + pair wave functions.</figDesc>
</figure>

Fig 3(correct)

<figure xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:id="fig_1" coords="7,53.09,230.09,101.28,7.88;7,156.69,228.44,5.98,5.25;7,163.20,228.28,123.01,9.69;7,41.14,240.26,245.09,8.97;7,41.14,252.00,104.99,7.88">
	<head>FIG. 3 .</head>
	<label>3</label>
	<figDesc>FIG. 3. Energy curve of the 10 B(3 + 0) with respect to the parameter d. The parameter c is set to be d = 1 − c. Other parameters are fixed at the optimized values.</figDesc>
</figure>

v6.2.xml -> v7.0.xml

https://gist.github.com/elonzh/f4e59232ddaded31ee23735f994ea4b6/revisions

both versions have the same issue.

V6.2
V7

Issue Analytics

State:
Created 2 years ago
Reactions:1
Comments:5 (4 by maintainers)

Top GitHub Comments

1reaction

suyogrichacommented, Feb 2, 2022

Same here. +1

1reaction

kermitt2commented, Jul 1, 2021

I think this is due to the vector graphics, there’s still something I need to fix to take them into account when aggregating the figure zones. This is coming from pdfalto which provides the coordinates of vector graphics differently as before, and I think they are mostly not used now (likely one of the reasons why the figure are working so badly overall currently).

Top Results From Across the Web

Wrongfully Accused by an Algorithm - The New York Times

Williams's case combines flawed technology with poor police work, illustrating how facial recognition can go awry. The Shinola shoplifting ...

An individual difference analysis of false recognition - PMC

The false recognition phenomenon is the finding that new items that are related to actually presented items are falsely recognized as old in...

False Recognition in Short-Term Memory – Age-Differences in ...

Compared to young adults, older adults are more susceptible to endorse false memories as genuine and exhibit higher confidence in their ...

Learning Through Error Recognition Using The Three Strikes ...

One such error recognition method is called “Three Strikes”. ... Figure 1, demonstrates a common error that takes place when performing groupings in...

Intelligent Recognition Method of Athlete Wrong ... - Hindawi

Intelligent Recognition Method of Sports Athletes' Wrong Actions Based on ... Figure 1 is the basic structure of computer vision system, ...