Why not app.use(generator) ?
See original GitHub issueLike this
app.use(function *(next) {
var start = new Date;
yield next;
var ms = new Date - start;
console.log('%s %s - %s', this.method, this.url, ms);
});
Is there a reason for that?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 10 years ago
- Comments:11 (11 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
app.use() requires a generator function · Issue #207 - GitHub
So I believe the problem is that, when there is no get , post , etc, just some use , then 6.0.0 doesn't...
Read more >Why am I getting error "requires a generator function"
Here is the error I get when starting node. Any clues? AssertionError: app.use() requires a generator function at Application.app.
Read more >Code Generation on Mobile Devices for Mobile Apps
A desktop will be of no use without a generator when power goes out, and a laptop will run out in 3 to...
Read more >How to Use Facebook Code Generator for iPhone, iPad or ...
In this video I'll show you how to use Facebook Code Generator for an ... Choose to either save or not save this...
Read more >Honda My Generator on the App Store - Apple
Honda “My Generator” smartphone application is for use only with Honda generators equipped with Bluetooth® technology. The application is able to do the ......
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
maybe we’ll see it changed:
another nice thing about the dispatcher approach though is we can remove
downstream
, since we can check that it’s reached the furthest downstream middleware