Calling `get` on a channel returns the wrong error
See original GitHub issueThe Issue
Calling get
on a channel returns a “Failed to resolve” error, when it should instead say that channels are not get
able.
Steps to Reproduce
- Run the daemon
lbrynet-cli get @lbry
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Comments:7 (5 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
go - Return error from the channel - Stack Overflow
It's common to bundle multiple outputs into a struct, and return them together over a single channel. type Result struct { Message string ......
Read more >Effective Go - The Go Programming Language
Remember that make applies only to maps, slices and channels and does not return a pointer. To obtain an explicit pointer allocate with...
Read more >YouTube Data API - Errors | Google Developers
channelBanners. The following tables identify error messages that the API returns in response to calls related to channelBanners resources. ...
Read more >Appeal Community Guidelines actions - YouTube Help
If you think that your content doesn't violate the Community Guidelines and was removed in error, use the form provided in the email...
Read more >Error 'bad value for restricted picklist field' appears when a ...
If the object does not include Record Types - This error occurs if the picklist field sets the value. All record types should...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
@KamilPiekutowski the IDE most of us use at lbry is PyCharm. The free community edition of the IDE may do what you want but I’d recommend the paid Professional version and if you don’t want to pay for it you can try the Early Release Program which are free alpha versions of the professional edition (they are good for 30 days I think but you can just keep upgrading it to the most recent version indefinitely).
@eukreign Thank you very much for your insight. I already started using PyCharm community version just to test things out. I will probably go with paid version depending where the things go.