domain entity featurization dump format
See original GitHub issueReading a domain with
intents:
- intent1:
use_entities: False
currently leads to a dump format (if domain is persisted) which is a bit confusing
intents:
- intent1:
use_entities: []
ignore_entities: []
Ric also said:
I’m not sure because in the docs and examples we give use_entities: None or use_entities: False. So I think to preserve that syntax we should dump use_entities: False in the case of an empty list. but that too is a rasa code change
We should check if we adapt the docs / code.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:6 (6 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Components - Rasa
There are components for entity extraction, for intent classification, ... Get a clean language corpus (a Wikipedia dump works) as a set of...
Read more >Designing a microservice domain model - Microsoft Learn
NET Microservices Architecture for Containerized .NET Applications | Understand the key concepts when designing a DDD-oriented domain model.
Read more >Dealing with entities serialization in DDD - Stack Overflow
Since I'm trying to stick to a DDD I would know if what I'm doing is considered as anti-pattern.
Read more >What Are Aggregates In Domain-Driven Design? - James Hickey
An aggregate is not: Just a graph of entities; Merely a behaviour rich object; An entity or collection of entities that you can...
Read more >Understanding Domain Entities [with Examples] - DDD w
This is part of the Domain-Driven Design w/ TypeScript & Node.js course. ... a domain object to the format needed to save it...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
But as far as I can see there is no issue with the
[]
for the value ofuse_entities
right? I think we should change the documentation to use[]
instead offalse
@akelad Wait, isn’t it already closed?