Test too slow: test_mean_shift.py::test_parallel
See original GitHub issueThis test is waaay to slow (about the same time as the next 4 slowest tests together, which are also too slow): Travis says
64.80s call sklearn/cluster/tests/test_mean_shift.py::test_parallel
The core of the tests doesn’t seem like it has been touched since #5189 by @GaelVaroquaux but I don’t remember the test being so slow back then (I’ll confirm though).
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Comments:14 (14 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Why does pytest-xdist make my tests run slower, not faster?
When parallelized may be slower: total test duration is quite slow (under 2minutes) - bootraping pytest workers adds extra time, if that is ......
Read more >Running tests in parallel is not any faster than without pytest ...
I have no idea what is going on here, but no matter how I run the tests, I'm not getting them to run...
Read more >Test Parallelization Using Python and Pytest
Our tests should pass in 16.91 seconds— not too slow for a battery of five UI tests. However, we can speed it up....
Read more >Testing - Hugging Face
As mentioned earlier make test runs tests in parallel via pytest-xdist plugin ( -n X ... For example, if a test is slow...
Read more >Pytest - Run Tests in Parallel - Tutorialspoint
Learn Pytest From Scratch By default, pytest runs tests in sequential order. In a real scenario, a test suite will have a number...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Ha, I fixed that last week in joblib: https://github.com/joblib/joblib/pull/690
this is fixed