About the results
See original GitHub issueHi Shaoshuai,
Thanks for your great paper and implementation ~ I have tried your provided checkpoint and it reproduced exactly the same results as what is reported in README.md.
However, when I went through the training process provided in README.md according to your instructions, I got the final results as follows:
bbox AP:97.4753, 89.2702, 88.8074
bev AP:89.1184, 87.2523, 86.3265
3d AP:86.1782, 77.1745, 76.6546
aos AP:97.46, 89.10, 88.54
I got slightly better results (in terms of 3D AP and BEV) if I used RCNN trained at epoch 23 instead of 30 and RPN trained at epoch 200:
bbox AP:97.3265, 89.3636, 88.8258
bev AP:89.6408, 87.2576, 85.9677
3d AP:87.3695, 77.6297, 76.8561
aos AP:97.31, 89.22, 88.59
Both results cannot match up with the pretrained model.
I noticed that the major difference between the model in the provided training pipeline and the official testing pipeline is that the official testing pipeline uses RPN.LOC_XZ_FINE=False
. Should I do so if I want to train my model from scratch? Besides, I noticed in the paper that the RCNN stage is trained for 50 epochs. However, in the provided instructions, the epoch number is 30.
Thanks a lot for your reply~
Best, Ken
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:8 (1 by maintainers)
@sshaoshuai @kentangSJTU @tengteng95 , Hi~ I used the default configuration to train the offline-augmentation version, and the 3D AP for car (easy) is about 85.2% with (rpn_model: 200 epoch, rcnn_model: 40 epoch). Could you provide your detailed setting for achieving the result you claimed?
@xuntan97 hi,do you solve this problem? I have the same questions.