[RLC] Use title as client type
See original GitHub issueI think we should change the client type to the value of title
, instead of {value_of_title} + RestClient
. The reasons of doing this change are:
- It is different from other language as they use
{value_of_title}
as client type directly. We should keep consistent with them. - The value of
title
is the name of a function which creates client. Most times, the value oftitle
is in pascal, which doesn’t meet the specification of Typescript code style. For example, PurviewScanning.
Suggested Changes:
- Change the client type to the value of
title
. - Change the name function, which creates client, to
create + {value_of_title}
.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 2 years ago
- Comments:6 (6 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Implement series RLC branch - Simulink - MathWorks
The Series RLC Branch block implements a single resistor, inductor, ... Use the Branch type parameter to select elements you want to include...
Read more >rules of the land court - Hawaii State Judiciary
NUMBERING OF APPLICATIONS; ABBREVIATION OF LAND COURT APPLICATION ... Certificate means a certificate of title showing the owner's name, a description of ...
Read more >Serena Release Control: SBM Plugin Quick Reference
Serena Deployment Automation RLC provider implements execution and deployment unit provider types for SDA Component Versions. serena-provider-sdacomponentvers- ...
Read more >RLC FAQs | Henry Company
Do products meet/qualify for California Title 24? California Title 24 is the state energy code. All of Fortifiber's products can be used with...
Read more >Solved Title: Design and simulate passive filter below. (i)
Use PSpice or Multisim software to come out the output-signal (type of filter). ... it should consist 2 loops RLC, please use multism...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
I don’t remember we added this suffix, I think it’s fine to remove it if we did.
Close as code merged.