remove no-useless-escape from eslint:recommended
See original GitHub issue2 similar rules:
no-useless-escape
was categorized tobest practice
, and is recommended.no-extra-parens
waspossible errors
, and is not recommended.
this rule need to be removed from eslint:recommended
, given we had been setting a high bar to add new rules(eg. no-eval).
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Reactions:2
- Comments:5 (5 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
no-useless-escape - ESLint - Pluggable JavaScript Linter
The "extends": "eslint:recommended" property in a configuration file ... This rule flags escapes that can be safely removed without changing behavior.
Read more >Disable Unnecessary escape character: \/ no-useless-escape
To disable all rules on a specific line, use a line or block comment in one of the following formats: alert('foo'); // eslint-disable-line ......
Read more >regexp/no-useless-escape
This rule reports unnecessary escape characters in RegExp. You may be able to find another mistake by finding unnecessary escapes.
Read more >Improve Readability with ES6 Template Strings
# ESLint: no-useless-escape ... ESLint or any linter is like a spell checker in a word document. It goes through your code and...
Read more >No-useless-escape - ESLint - W3cubDocs
This rule flags escapes that can be safely removed without changing behavior. Examples of incorrect code for this rule: /*eslint no-useless-escape: "error"*/"\' ...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
I’m not sure why do you compare those two rules. Those look non related.
Why do you think that
no-useless-escape
is not proper for recommended?@aladdin-add Feel free to close this if you’re not planning on championing this proposal any longer. It’s been open for half a year now, so we should probably make a decision either way!