Jest mock/spy returns undefined even when set up
  • 14-May-2023
Lightrun Team
Author Lightrun Team
Share
Jest mock/spy returns undefined even when set up

Jest mock/spy returns undefined even when set up

Lightrun Team
Lightrun Team
14-May-2023

Explanation of the problem

When using the Jest mock system, a common issue that developers may encounter is the mocking spy return doing nothing. This issue can arise when developers copy-paste examples from the Jest documentation and find that the mocked function does not return the expected result. In the code snippet provided, the issue is with the function someUtil.m1() returning undefined instead of the expected value of 42.

Troubleshooting with the Lightrun Developer Observability Platform

Getting a sense of what’s actually happening inside a live application is a frustrating experience, one that relies mostly on querying and observing whatever logs were written during development.
Lightrun is a Developer Observability Platform, allowing developers to add telemetry to live applications in real-time, on-demand, and right from the IDE.

  • Instantly add logs to, set metrics in, and take snapshots of live applications
  • Insights delivered straight to your IDE or CLI
  • Works where you do: dev, QA, staging, CI/CD, and production

Start for free today

Problem solution for: Jest mock/spy returns undefined even when set up

To address this issue, developers can take several steps. First, they should ensure that the mocked module is imported correctly and that the mock is actually being used in the test. In the provided example, the module is mocked using jest.mock('./someUtil'). However, if the import statement for the module is incorrect, the mock will not be used, and the original implementation will be called instead. Additionally, developers can use the toHaveBeenCalled() method to check if the mocked function has been called. For example:

// someUtil.test.js import someUtil from ‘./someUtil’;

jest.mock(‘./someUtil’)

console.log(someUtil.m1) // expected spy stuff console.log(someUtil.m1()) // undefined 🤯 expect(someUtil.m1).toHaveBeenCalled()

Another potential solution is to use the mockReturnValue() method to specify the return value of the mocked function. This method can be used to override the default implementation of the mocked function and specify the desired return value. For example:

// someUtil.test.js import someUtil from ‘./someUtil’;

jest.mock(‘./someUtil’, () => ({ m1: jest.fn().mockReturnValue(42), }));

console.log(someUtil.m1) // expected spy stuff console.log(someUtil.m1()) // should return 42 expect(someUtil.m1).toHaveBeenCalled()

By using mockReturnValue(), developers can ensure that the mocked function returns the expected value and avoid issues with the mock system not working as expected.

 

Other popular problems with jest

 

Problem 1: Mock does not return expected value

One common issue with Jest is that mocks may not return the expected value. This can occur if the mock is not set up correctly or if the test is not written properly. For example, if a mock is not correctly initialized, it may return undefined instead of the expected value.

To resolve this issue, it is important to ensure that the mock is set up correctly with the desired return value. One way to do this is to use the jest.fn() method to create a new mock function and specify the return value. Another approach is to use the mockReturnValue() method to specify the return value for an existing mock function.

 

// Example of creating a new mock function with jest.fn()
const myMock = jest.fn(() => 'Hello, World!');
console.log(myMock()); // Output: 'Hello, World!'

// Example of specifying the return value for an existing mock function
const myMock = jest.fn();
myMock.mockReturnValue('Hello, World!');
console.log(myMock()); // Output: 'Hello, World!'

 

Problem 2: Mocked module not found

Another common issue with Jest is that mocked modules may not be found. This can occur if the module being mocked is not in the correct location or if the import statement for the mocked module is incorrect.

To resolve this issue, it is important to ensure that the module being mocked is located in the correct location and that the import statement for the mocked module is correct. For example, if the module being mocked is located in the same directory as the test file, the import statement should be:

 

jest.mock('./myModule');

 

If the module being mocked is located in a different directory, the import statement should reflect the correct file path. Additionally, it is important to ensure that the module being mocked is exported correctly, with the desired functions or objects to be mocked.

Problem 3: Asynchronous tests timing out

Jest supports asynchronous tests, but sometimes these tests can time out if the asynchronous code takes too long to complete. This can occur if the asynchronous code is not written correctly or if the timeout setting for Jest is not set high enough.

To resolve this issue, it is important to ensure that the asynchronous code is written correctly and that the timeout setting for Jest is set high enough to allow the asynchronous code to complete. One way to do this is to use the done parameter in the test function to signal when the asynchronous code has completed. For example:

 

test('asynchronous test', (done) => {
  setTimeout(() => {
    expect(1 + 2).toBe(3);
    done();
  }, 1000);
}, 5000);

 

In this example, the test function uses the done parameter to signal when the asynchronous code has completed. Additionally, the timeout setting for Jest is set to 5000 milliseconds, which allows enough time for the asynchronous code to complete before timing out.

 

A brief introduction to jest

 

Jest is a popular JavaScript testing framework that is widely used in the development of web applications. It is built on top of Jasmine, a behavior-driven development (BDD) framework, and provides a powerful set of tools for testing JavaScript code. Jest is designed to be easy to set up and use, with a focus on simplicity and ease of use. It comes with a built-in test runner, assertion library, and mocking functionality, making it a comprehensive solution for testing JavaScript code.

One of the key features of Jest is its ability to run tests in parallel, allowing developers to run multiple tests simultaneously and speed up the testing process. This is achieved using worker threads, which are used to run tests in parallel across multiple CPU cores. Jest also provides a range of configuration options, allowing developers to customize the testing environment to suit their needs. For example, Jest allows developers to configure test timeouts, control the behavior of console output during tests, and configure the use of test matchers.

Overall, Jest is a powerful and flexible testing framework that provides a comprehensive set of tools for testing JavaScript code. Its focus on simplicity and ease of use make it a popular choice among developers, while its support for parallel testing and customizable configuration options make it a powerful solution for testing complex web applications.

 

Most popular use cases for jest

  1. Jest can be used for unit testing and integration testing in JavaScript projects. Jest provides a comprehensive set of features for writing and running tests, such as assertions, mocks, and code coverage reporting. Here’s an example of a simple test using Jest:

 

test('adds 1 + 2 to equal 3', () => {
  expect(1 + 2).toBe(3);
});

 

This test checks whether the expression 1 + 2 evaluates to 3 using the toBe() matcher. Jest allows you to write tests in a variety of styles and supports a wide range of matchers for asserting the behavior of your code.

  1. Jest can be used for snapshot testing, which allows you to compare the current output of a component or function to a previously saved snapshot. Snapshot testing can help catch regressions and ensure that your code produces consistent output over time. Here’s an example of a snapshot test:

 

test('renders a button', () => {
  const button = renderer.create(<Button label="Click me" />).toJSON();
  expect(button).toMatchSnapshot();
});

 

This test creates a snapshot of the rendered output of a Button component and compares it to a previously saved snapshot. If the output has changed, Jest will show a diff and prompt you to update the snapshot if the change is expected.

  1. Jest can be used for end-to-end testing with tools like Puppeteer or WebDriver. This allows you to simulate user interactions with your application and verify that it behaves correctly in a real-world environment. Here’s an example of an end-to-end test using Puppeteer:
test('clicks a button', async () => {
  const browser = await puppeteer.launch();
  const page = await browser.newPage();
  await page.goto('https://example.com');
  await page.click('button');
  const buttonText = await page.$eval('button', el => el.textContent);
  expect(buttonText).toBe('Clicked!');
  await browser.close();
});
This test launches a headless browser using Puppeteer, navigates to a page, clicks a button, and verifies that the button text has changed. Jest’s built-in test runner makes it easy to run end-to-end tests alongside your other tests and get a comprehensive view of your code’s test coverage.
Share

It’s Really not that Complicated.

You can actually understand what’s going on inside your live applications.

Try Lightrun’s Playground

Lets Talk!

Looking for more information about Lightrun and debugging?
We’d love to hear from you!
Drop us a line and we’ll get back to you shortly.

By submitting this form, I agree to Lightrun’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.