Disable type checking for node_modules entirely
  • 11-Jun-2023
Lightrun Team
Author Lightrun Team
Disable type checking for node_modules entirely

Disable type checking for node_modules entirely

Lightrun Team
Lightrun Team

Explanation of the problem

To introduce a new option or modify the existing “skipLibCheck” option in TypeScript, there is a suggestion to provide the ability to disable type checking for the “node_modules” directory. This feature would be beneficial in scenarios where library authors may have faulty imports or provide only TypeScript files without transpiled code. By allowing users to disable type checking for specific libraries or the entire “node_modules” directory, it provides flexibility and trust in the library’s compatibility and testing.

One example cited is when a library ships with a “dist/” folder containing well-arranged “.d.ts” files, but a single file within the library imports TypeScript source files instead of the transpiled ones. While the library author may not have encountered issues due to a different tsconfig and the absence of strict type checking, users who enable strict type checking may encounter errors when the TypeScript source files of the library author undergo type checking.

The suggestion aligns with the desire to have control over type checking for external dependencies in the “node_modules” directory. It acknowledges that TypeScript settings like “noImplicitAny” should be applied to user code being compiled, not to the external dependencies. By allowing users to exclude type checking for specific libraries within “node_modules,” they can mitigate issues caused by incompatible TypeScript configurations and focus on their own code without being hindered by errors originating from external libraries.

Overall, the proposal suggests introducing an option to disable type checking for the “node_modules” directory or specific libraries within it, addressing scenarios where library authors provide TypeScript files without transpiled code or encounter compatibility issues due to different TypeScript configurations. By granting control over type checking in external dependencies, TypeScript users can ensure a smoother development experience and avoid unnecessary errors arising from library sources.

Troubleshooting with the Lightrun Developer Observability Platform

Getting a sense of what’s actually happening inside a live application is a frustrating experience, one that relies mostly on querying and observing whatever logs were written during development.
Lightrun is a Developer Observability Platform, allowing developers to add telemetry to live applications in real-time, on-demand, and right from the IDE.

  • Instantly add logs to, set metrics in, and take snapshots of live applications
  • Insights delivered straight to your IDE or CLI
  • Works where you do: dev, QA, staging, CI/CD, and production

Start for free today

Problem solution for Disable type checking for node_modules entirely

The question posed suggests the need for a flag or option in TypeScript to suppress error messages originating from files in the “node_modules” directory. The first answer proposes the idea of having a flag that ignores and does not display errors from “node_modules” while still exiting with a code of 0. It emphasizes that the purpose of such a flag is to only consider errors outside of “node_modules” as significant, as the errors within third-party libraries may not be under the user’s control. The example provided highlights duplicate identifier errors from a library’s declaration files, which the user wishes to ignore due to their abundance and lack of impact on their own code.

The second answer sheds light on the challenges faced when consuming third-party libraries that only provide “.ts” files and lack strict typing. Disabling the strict flag across repositories is seen as a workaround to accommodate these libraries, but it hinders the ability to enforce strict typing within the user’s own codebase. The example mentions issues related to the use of “any” types and function type mismatches. The manual process of filtering out errors from “node_modules” and identifying errors within the user’s own code is described as error-prone and ineffective. The suggestion mentioned in the second answer, which was rejected as a “configuration issue,” aligns with the desire for a solution that allows enforcing stricter typing while handling the discrepancies with third-party libraries.

In summary, the aggregated answer acknowledges the need for a mechanism to ignore or suppress errors originating from “node_modules” in TypeScript. It recognizes that the abundance of errors within third-party libraries may not be of immediate concern and suggests focusing on errors outside of “node_modules” that impact the user’s own codebase. The examples provided highlight the frustration caused by duplicate identifier errors and the challenges faced in maintaining strict typing standards when consuming libraries that lack strict typing themselves. The aggregated response supports the proposal for an option or flag to address this issue and enhance the development experience by allowing stricter type checking while accommodating discrepancies in third-party libraries.

Other popular problems with Microsoft TypeScript

Problem: Incorrect Use of TypeScript Interfaces

TypeScript interfaces are a powerful tool for enforcing strict type checking in a codebase. However, incorrect use of interfaces can lead to problems with code accuracy and maintainability. For example, if an interface is defined with properties that are not used elsewhere in the code, it can be difficult to track down the source of an error later on.


To avoid this problem, it is recommended to make use of strict null checking and optional properties in interfaces. Additionally, be mindful of the properties and methods defined in an interface, and make sure that they are actually used elsewhere in the code. If an interface is no longer needed, it should be removed to prevent confusion and errors.

Problem: TypeScript Compilation Errors

TypeScript is a statically-typed language, which means that all type information is known at compile time. This can lead to compilation errors when code is written that violates TypeScript’s type system. For example, if a variable is declared with a type of string, and an attempt is made to assign a value of type number to it, a compile-time error will occur.


To resolve TypeScript compilation errors, it is important to carefully review the code and make sure that all variables are correctly declared with the correct type. In cases where a variable needs to be used with different types, a union type can be used to specify multiple types for the same variable. Additionally, the TypeScript documentation provides detailed information about the type system, and can be a valuable resource for resolving compilation errors.

Problem: Managing TypeScript Dependencies

Managing dependencies in a TypeScript project can be challenging, as different libraries and packages may have different versions and compatibility requirements. This can lead to conflicts and errors when attempting to use multiple libraries that have incompatible dependencies.


To resolve dependency management issues in a TypeScript project, it is recommended to make use of a package manager such as npm or yarn. These tools provide automated dependency management, and can help to prevent conflicts and errors when using multiple libraries and packages. Additionally, it is important to keep dependencies up-to-date, as newer versions may resolve compatibility issues and improve the overall stability of the project.

A brief introduction to Microsoft TypeScript

Microsoft TypeScript is a statically-typed, open-source programming language that builds on JavaScript. It is designed to provide optional type safety, improved tooling, and enhanced scalability to JavaScript code. TypeScript offers a language structure that is familiar to JavaScript developers, but with the added benefits of static type checking and enhanced tooling support.

TypeScript is designed to be compatible with existing JavaScript code and integrates seamlessly into many popular development environments and build tools. The language offers features such as class and interface definitions, type inference, and advanced type checking, making it easier for developers to write robust, maintainable code. TypeScript also includes a transpiler that can convert TypeScript code into equivalent JavaScript code, allowing developers to write TypeScript code that can run in any environment that supports JavaScript.

Most popular use cases for Microsoft TypeScript

  1. Large-scale web application development: TypeScript is well-suited for developing large-scale web applications, as it provides developers with the ability to write scalable, maintainable code. With its optional type checking, developers can catch type-related errors at compile time, making it easier to catch bugs and reduce the time spent debugging code. Additionally, TypeScript’s compatibility with existing JavaScript code allows developers to gradually adopt the language in their existing codebases, making it easier to transition to a statically-typed codebase.
class User {
    name: string;
    email: string;

    constructor(name: string, email: string) {
        this.name = name;
        this.email = email;

const user = new User("John Doe", "johndoe@example.com");
  1. Improved tooling support: TypeScript integrates well with modern development environments and build tools, making it easier for developers to write, manage, and maintain code. With TypeScript’s enhanced tooling support, developers can benefit from features such as code completion, refactoring, and debugging, which can help to increase developer productivity and reduce the time spent on manual code management tasks.
  2. Interoperability with JavaScript libraries: TypeScript is designed to be compatible with existing JavaScript code, making it easy for developers to integrate TypeScript with existing JavaScript libraries and codebases. Additionally, TypeScript provides a way to define type information for JavaScript libraries, making it easier to write TypeScript code that interacts with existing JavaScript libraries in a type-safe manner. This can help to reduce the time spent debugging and improve the overall stability of code.

It’s Really not that Complicated.

You can actually understand what’s going on inside your live applications. It’s a registration form away.

Get Lightrun

Lets Talk!

Looking for more information about Lightrun and debugging?
We’d love to hear from you!
Drop us a line and we’ll get back to you shortly.

By submitting this form, I agree to Lightrun’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.